Arrogant referees eventually retire and good papers eventually get published

Having a bad review experience (like this bad reviewing patterns ) is always upsetting but for phd students it can be really disheartening since probably that paper had been his only focus for some months. When this happens I try to explain them that 1 – this is (unfortunately) part of the life of a researcher and they better get used to it and 2 – if the work is good we’ll manage to publish it in another venue.

As usual, Bertrand Meyer, summarizes all my feelings on this topic (and in just one sentence):

Arrogant referees eventually retire and good papers eventually get published

if you liked this post please consider following my thoughts on twitter and visit my other projects: the modeling languages portal, wordpress <-> drupal migration services and my stories of a failed entrepreneur.

About these ads

About softmodeling

Check http://modeling-languages.com and http://wp-abtesting.com
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Arrogant referees eventually retire and good papers eventually get published

  1. Jeff says:

    What about the problem that every authors believes his/her paper to be a good one?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s